Bad timing

Miley Cyrus’ topless pic from Vanity Fair
Miley Cyrus’ topless pic from Vanity Fair

The Miley Cyrus camp is in full spin control mode after those “racy” pics that circulated the web last week. Complicating matters is a semi-topless photoshoot she did with famed photographer Annie Leibovitz that’s set to be published in the new issue of Vanity Fair. Uhhh, oops. Cyrus told Entertainment Tonight:

“I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about.”

A Disney Channel spokesperson added:

“Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines.”

This is just one more example of how working for Disney turns young actresses into whores. Britney - “encouraged” to striptease at age 12. Christina - “manipulated” into blowing Michael Eisner at 14. And Lindsay - “tricked” into playing the role of a urinal in one of my private “art films” . . . last week. If Miley wants to follow in those ladies’ footsteps, she needs to start dating Pacman Jones ASAP.

NOTE: Found some more “racy” pics of Miley — now with 100% more making out!

Miley Cyrus kissing boyfriend Thomas Sturges

[ONTD]

Read more about: Miley Cyrus

15 Comments on “Bad timing”

  1. SO_WHAT???

    She is NOT topless…everyone says that she’s only 15 and she shouldnt be doing this, but she did not do anything bad!She is FULLY covered with a sheet - she is not showing any ass,tits…etc.
    Actually if this was a bikini photoshoot she would have shown A LOT more skin.So unless you consider everyone that wears a sheet instead of a bikini top or a bra as being topless - ShutTheFuckUp !!!

  2. 8 inches

    ^^^^^^^^^No, I don’t consider people who wear a sheet ‘topless”…I consider them “racist”!

  3. SNS

    Not that im defending young girls acting how she is… but are you an old fart? Have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years?

    Young teenage girls are not sweet little angels anymore and OMG she kissing a guy, and OMG shes flashing her bar in some photos and was stupid enough to do an arty shoot.

    Big deal! There are 14 year old girls doing far worse on other websites and in real life. None of her behavior is unusual for a teenage girl!!!

    Or maybe I just live in an area in the UK where all teenage girls are complete sluts!

  4. allie

    If vanity fair wanted to sell lots of magazines, they should have picked someone else for the cover. Im actually NOT going to buy this issue because this little girl is ugly and over rated

  5. Just Saying

    Co-sign with allie.

  6. jodie

    omg this is what there making such a big deal about, i would be embarrased if i was her, it looks like one of those bad got milk adds, she looks like shit, and whats with her hair looks like they dumped the milk over her head, her face is too white, this is supposed to be a fashion shoot, it does look like classic vanity fair, but the ruined her, her hair is too dark, and if this is what everyone is making such a big deal about, get a life.

  7. SO_WHAT???

    LOL @ 8 inches - I agree although I think you’re reffering to a certain ‘hooded’ group of individuals that wear sheets…nice pun though.

  8. Pinkey

    She talks a good game. She brought up her Christian values and wholesome lifestyle. Expect the questions, kay?

  9. April Showers

    I’m still so glad I had sons, not daughters.
    And as far as Disney goes, been on a boycot ever since Bambi 2.

  10. bee

    i did not think she could get any uglier but vanity fair managed to do that good job guys

  11. Pregnacy Pool

    December. Twins.

  12. James

    She’s not even topless. That’s false advertising. Boo on you.

  13. Painted like a house

    Its funny because the photographer chick was like, we put very little makeup on.. right… so she naturally looks like a vampire…

  14. Carlos

    Come on, guys. Let’s leave the filthy little whore alone. She has a lifetime of “oopsies” ahead of her.

  15. Whats the big deal over her back being shown? Plus Why did they need Anne Lebowitz to take such a simple photo? I was expecting something really creative. I could have done that with my canon powershot and then desaturate the image in Photoshop. Bige deal.

Leave a Comment

NOTE: It may take up to 10 minutes for a comment to appear (I'm working on a fix). Please do not submit your comment twice.